Author: Haresh Kumar Giri
DOI Link :: https://doi.org/10.70798/Bijmrd/01020008
Abstract: A significant number of forest dwellers and rural populations globally depend on the utilization of forest resources for their livelihoods. Utilizing forest resources for livelihood enhancement is both cost-effective and environmentally sustainable, promoting equitable distribution. The provision of forest resources is of immense significance to the tribal inhabitants of Jharkhand. To develop comprehensive livelihood plans for the local community, it is essential to analyse both the advantages and disadvantages of forest-based tribal subsistence. The level of education, social engagement, family structure, landholding size, primary occupation, housing conditions, farm power, agricultural implements, livestock ownership, material possessions, aspirations, extension contacts, information sources, employment and migration status, forest resource utilization, knowledge of forestry practices, adoption of forestry practices, attitudes towards forestry, income derived from forestry, and gross annual income are pertinent factors in developing strategies for upliftment. This study examines these aspects in the underdeveloped district of Latehar in Jharkhand state. The interconnection between tribal populations, their reliance on forest resources for subsistence, and their poverty is complex, necessitating area-specific research. Developing a research plan that incorporates multi-disciplinary approaches is essential for analysing the role and potential of forest resources in tribal livelihoods, poverty alleviation, socio-economic development, nutritional security, environmental conservation, migration control, and rural development, along with the evolving patterns and underlying causes of these changes. The findings of this study indicate that, despite residing in resource-rich areas, tribal communities occupy an unfavourable position across multiple dimensions. The low sociopersonal and economic status of tribal communities is evident in acute poverty, limited employment opportunities leading to migration, insufficient communication and extension services, inadequate infrastructure, and substandard education and healthcare facilities. Residents of the study region rely significantly on forest resources for their livelihoods, exhibit positive attitudes toward forestry, possess a solid understanding of forestry methods, and demonstrate a motivation to improve their quality of life.
Keywords: Livelihood, Forest, Education, Socio-Economic, Migration, Infrastructure.
Page No: 65-71